Skittles unfit for human consumption

Skittles unfit for human consumption

The vibrant, fruit-flavored candy Skittles is under fire after a complaint was filed in Northern Californi. Alleging that consumers are tasting more than the colours of the rainbow.
Even though the majority of people can name Skittles tastes like lemon, strawberry, & orange. Very few can certainly name titanium dioxide, a colouring agent that contributes to the candy’ vibrant colour.

Skittles Unfit For Human Consumption –

According to a lawsuit submitted last week in the Northern District of California against the Mars candy firm. That component is a “known poison” and “unfit for human consumption.” It contends that American consumers are ignorant of the health dangers posed by artificial food colouring.

TiO2 is an active ingredient in Skittles –

According to the lawsuit, titanium dioxide, also known as TiO2, is listed as an ingredient in Skittles . That are sold in the US even though it has been taken out of the candy’s composition in a number of European countries and is prohibited in a number of other nations.


EFSA determination on TiO2 –

Mars Inc. stated that titanium dioxide “poses no known dangers to human health or safety” in 2016 & vowed to phase it out. At approximately the same time, the European Food Safety Authority stated that there was confusion regarding the ingredient’s categorization. However, the EFSA determined in May 2021. That there was sufficient data to show that titanium dioxide was no longer safe when used as a food additive.

According to the group, TiO2 particles were genotoxic, or potentially carcinogenic, meaning they might damage a person’s DNA. The EFSA stated that although there is little absorption of titanium dioxide particles following oral administration, they may build up in the body.

Jenile Thames of San Leandro, California, filed a lawsuit against the Mars candy business on Thursday with the intention of turning the complaint into a class action.

Are they still safe to eat –

Consumers are urged to “Taste the Rainbow” by the chocolates’ wacky multicoloured advertising. However, it does not get into the specifics of food additives.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved titanium dioxide for human ingestion in 1966. It is a component of many dishes, including salad dressing, sandwich spreads, and baked goods.

The FDA maintains that titanium dioxide is a safe food colourant as of March 29 and that its use as an ingredient must not exceed 1 percent by weight of the product.

The European Food Safety Authority, however, views TiO2 differently. The use of titanium dioxide as a food additive was “no longer [considered] safe,” according to its scientists, in May 2021.

The agency claimed that while the general hazardous effects of the component were not conclusive. It was unable to define a safe limit for daily intake of TiO2 as a food additive & could not completely rule out the dangers of the food colouring. By the end of the year, the European Commission will outlaw titanium dioxide, often known as E171.

Is titanium dioxide necessary to make Skittles?

Preservatives that delay product degradation as well as vitamins and spices are included in the idea of food additives. According to the FDA, colour additives include dyes, pigments, and other compounds added to food, medicine, or cosmetics.

Skittles’ vibrant colours come from titanium dioxide, but other goods on the market don’t include it, according to court documents.

The lawsuit claims that many of the defendant’s rivals “do not insert TiO2 in their products and still are able to preserve the colourful impression the defendant wishes to generate with its products.”


Bright-red Swedish Fish Soft & Chewy Candy, Black Forest Gummy Bears, & Sour Patch Kids are just a few examples of the vibrant candy with appropriate names that don’t use titanium dioxide. According to the lawsuit, even M&Ms, which are marketed by Mars Inc., don’t contain titanium dioxide.

The U.S. takes a “wait and see” attitude when it comes to regulating food components, according to Tatiana Santos, chemicals manager with the European Environmental Bureau, a network of citizens’ advisory organisations.

According to Santos, “The U.S. frequently waits until the damage is done, and the EU attempts to prevent it to some level.” The U.S. frequently seems to prioritise the market over protection.

More Interesting Stories –

Jennifer Iopez Married With Ben

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.